臨床研究

tip、トルク、ローテーションの精度の評価:クリアアライナー矯正

tip、トルク、ローテーションの精度の評価:クリアアライナー矯正

歯科医師、特に矯正医向けの最新矯正論文情報サイト

日常診療で多忙な歯列矯正医のためのドクター専用サイトです。

日々の診療や臨床、医学研究に役立つ最新海外論文PubMedから情報を提供します。

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM)、すなわち、科学的根拠に基づいた医療情報を提供します。

アブストラクトだけでなく、結果の表やグラフなど詳しい情報を日本語に訳して提供しています。

今回は2022年Progress in Orthodonticsに投稿された論文をご紹介したします。現時点でのインパクトファクターは3.247です。この研究の目的はtip、トルク、ローテーションを定量化する3つの異なるAI 3Dデジタルモデルのソフトウエアの精度を評価することです。

是非最後までご覧いただき、お忙しい先生方の情報収集にお役立てください。

題目・著者

題目

TIP, TORQUE & ROTATIONS: How accurately do digital superimposition software packages quantify tooth movement?

著者

Samar M. Adel1* , Nikhilesh R. Vaid2, Nadia El‑Harouni1, Hassan Kassem1 and Abbas R. Zaher1

*Correspondence: orthosamar@gmail.com
1
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University,
Champollion Street, El Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt

Progress in Orthodontics (2022) 23:8
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00402-x

*PubMedで読む!【PMID】35284950

詳しく読む!

引用文献

  1. Hayashi K, Uechi J, Lee S-P, Mizoguchi I. Three-dimensional analysis
    of orthodontic tooth movement based on XYZ and fnite helical axis
    systems. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:589–95.
  2. Gkantidis N, Schauseil M, Pazera P, Zorkun B, Katsaros C, Ludwig B.
    Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on vari‑
    ous skeletal structures of the head using surface models. PLoS ONE.
    2015;10:e0118810.
  3. Stucki S, Gkantidis N. Assessment of techniques used for superimposition
    of maxillary and mandibular 3D surface models to evaluate tooth move‑
    ment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42:559–70.
  4. Vaid NR. Digital technologies in orthodontics 2013;An update. Semin
    Orthod. 2018;24:373–5.
  5. Haouili N, Kravitz ND, Vaid NR, Ferguson DJ, Makki L. Has Invisalign
    improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efcacy of tooth move‑
    ment with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158:420–5.
  6. Cha BK, Choi JI, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Jeong YM. Applications of threedimensionally scanned models in orthodontics. Int J Comput Dent.
    2007;10:41–52.
  7. De Luca CG, Pachêco-Pereira C, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C, Major PW.
    Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital
    dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic
    review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18:65–76.
  8. Camardella LT, Ongkosuwito EM, Penning EW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM,
    Vilella OV, Breuning KH. Accuracy and reliability of measurements
    performed using two diferent software programs on digital models gen‑
    erated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners.
    Korean J Orthod. 2020;50:13–25.
  9. Araújo TMd, Fonseca LM, Caldas LD, Costa-Pinto RA. Preparation and
    evaluation of orthodontic setup. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17:146–65.
  10. Grauer D, Proft WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully custom‑
    ized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
    2011;140:433–43.
  11. Vasilakos G, Schilling R, Halazonetis D. Assessment of diferent techniques
    for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal
    structures. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5838.
  12. Talaat S, Kaboudan A, Bourauel C, Ragy N, Kula K, Ghoneima A. Validity
    and reliability of three-dimensional palatal superimposition of digital
    dental models. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39:365–70.
  13. Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Liv P, Bondemark L. A novel method for superim‑
    position and measurements on maxillary digital 3D models-studies on
    validity and reliability. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:45–51
  14. Bichu YM, Hansa I, Bichu AY, Premjani P, Flores-Mir C, Vaid NR. Applications
    of artifcial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping
    review. Prog Orthod. 2021;22:18.
  15. Vaid NR. Artifcial Intelligence (AI) driven orthodontic care: A quest
    toward utopia? Semin Orthod. 2021;27:57–61.
  16. Oliveira FP, Tavares JM. Medical image registration: a review. Comput
    Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014;17:73–93.
  17. Geomagic. Geomagic design X user guide. 2013. Available at: https://
    www.engineering.pitt.edu/uploadedFiles/_Content/Sub_Sites/Business/
    MRW/SCPI/_Library/specs/geomagicdesignx2014userguide.pdf.
  18. 3 Shape Ortho System. OrthoAnalyzer 2012 User Manual. 2012. Available
    at: http://promed.ua/wp-​content/uploads/2012/01/2012_OrthoAnaly
    zer_English.pdf.
  19. Awad MG, Ellouze S, Ashley S, Vaid N, Makki L, Ferguson DJ. Accuracy of
    digital predictions with CAD/CAM labial and lingual appliances: A retro‑
    spective cohort study. Semin Orthod. 2018;24:393–406.
  20. Thiruvenkatachari B, Al-Abdallah M, Akram NC, Sandler J, O’Brien K. Meas‑
    uring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser
    scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:480–5.
  21. Choi JI, Cha BK, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Choi DS, Jang IS. Validity of palatal
    superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with
    rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear. Korean J
    Orthod. 2012;42:235–41.
  22. Chen G, Chen S, Zhang XY, Jiang RP, Liu Y, Shi FH, et al. Stable region for
    maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of
    stable miniscrews. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:70–9.
  23. Jang I, Tanaka M, Koga Y, Iijima S, Yozgatian JH, Cha BK, et al. A novel
    method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement dur‑
    ing orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:447–53.
  24. An K, Jang I, Choi DS, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Cha BK. Identifcation of a sta‑
    ble reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models. J Orofac
    Orthop. 2015;76:508–19.
  25. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A,
    et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS)
    were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.
  26. Talaat S, Kaboudan A, Breuning H, Ragy N, Elshebiny T, Kula K, et al.
    Reliability of linear and angular dental measurements with the Ortho‑
    Mechanics Sequential Analyzer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
    2015;147:264–9.
  27. Walter S, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reli‑
    ability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:101–10.
  28. Daskalogiannakis J. Glossary of orthodontic terms Chicago: Quintessence
    Pub. Co.; 2000. Available from: http://books.google.com/books?id=
    DOtpAAAAMAAJ.
  29. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation
    coefcients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.
  30. Gandedkar NH, Vaid NR, Darendeliler MA, Premjani P, Ferguson DJ. The
    last decade in orthodontics: a scoping review of the hits, misses and the
    near misses! Semin Orthod. 2019;25:339–55.
  31. Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Yoshida N. Analysis of tooth move‑
    ment in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering
    technology. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:325–31.
  32. Sandler J, Thiruvenkatachari B, Gutierrez R. Measuring molar movement: a
    reliable technique. APOS Trends Orthod. 2017;7:63.
  33. Grünheid T, Loh C, Larson BE. How accurate is Invisalign in nonextrac‑
    tion cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved? Angle Orthod.
    2017;87:809–15.
  34. Sachdev S, Tantidhnazet S, Saengfai NN. Accuracy of tooth movement
    with in-house clear aligners. J World Fed Orthod. 2021;10:177–82.
  35. Chong DR, Jang YJ, Chun YS, Jung SH, Lee SK. The evaluation of rotational
    movements of maxillary posterior teeth using three dimensional images
    in cases of extraction of maxillary frst premolar. Korean J Orthod.
    2005;35:451–8.
  36. Chen J, Li S, Fang S. Quantifcation of tooth displacement from conebeam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
    2009;136:393–400.
  37. Barreto MS, Faber J, Vogel CJ, Araujo TM. Reliability of digital orthodontic
    setups. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:255–9.
  38. Camardella LT, Rothier EK, Vilella OV, Ongkosuwito EM, Breuning KH.
    Virtual setup: application in orthodontic practice. J Orofac Orthop.
    2016;77:409–19.
  39. Shukla D, Chowdhry A, Bablani D, Jain P, Thapar R. Establishing the
    reliability of palatal rugae pattern in individual identifcation (following
    orthodontic treatment). J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011;29:20–9.
  40. Ioshida M, Muñoz BA, Rios H, Cevidanes L, Aristizabal JF, Rey D, et al.
    Accuracy and reliability of mandibular digital model registration with use
    of the mucogingival junction as the reference. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
    Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2019;127:351–60.
  41. Ashmore JL, Kurland BF, King GJ, Wheeler TT, Ghafari J, Ramsay DS. A
    3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:18–29; discussion -30.
  42. Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Cha BK. Accuracy and
    reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models.
    Angle Orthod. 2010;80:497–503.
  43. Garib D, Miranda F, Yatabe MS, Lauris JRP, Massaro C, McNamara JA Jr,
    et al. Superimposition of maxillary digital models using the palatal rugae:
    Does ageing afect the reliability? Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:183–93.
  44. Pomerleau F, Colas F, Siegwart R, Magnenat S. Comparing ICP variants on
    real-world data sets. Auton Robots. 2013;34:133–48.

記事監修

ほりい矯正歯科クリニックロゴ
ほりい矯正歯科クリニック

免責事項

本サイトは、PubMedに投稿されたオープンアクセスの査読論文をご紹介しております。

研究計画やDiscussionについては、すべての論文にagreeしているわけではありません。

しかし、「矯正海外論文サイト」は、最新矯正論文を提供するサイトとして矯正医の皆様がそれぞれ議論していただける一つのきっかけとなってくれたらと考えております。

また、内容についての疑問等は一切受け付けておりません。著者ご本人に記載の連絡先にお問い合わせをお願い致します。

さらに、学会発表や研修会においては本サイトの孫引きではなく必ず原著論文をご確認くださいますようお願い致します。

日本においてマウスピース型矯正はご存知の通り、完成薬機法対象外の矯正歯科装置であり、医薬品副作用被害救済措置制度の対象外となる場合がありますのでご注意ください。

矯正海外論文サイト公式Instagramのお知らせ

本サイトは、PubMedに投稿されたオープンアクセスの査読論文をご紹介しております。

研究計画やDiscussionについては、すべての論文にagreeしているわけではありません。

しかし、「矯正海外論文サイト」は、最新矯正論文を提供するサイトとして矯正医の皆様がそれぞれ議論していただける一つのきっかけとなってくれたらと考えております。

また、内容についての疑問等は一切受け付けておりません。著者ご本人に記載の連絡先にお問い合わせをお願い致します。

さらに、学会発表や研修会においては本サイトの孫引きではなく必ず原著論文をご確認くださいますようお願い致します。

日本においてマウスピース型矯正はご存知の通り、完成薬機法対象外の矯正歯科装置であり、医薬品副作用被害救済措置制度の対象外となる場合がありますのでご注意ください。

矯正海外論文インスタグラム